Most UK businesses renting flexible office space are operating under a licence to occupy, not a commercial lease. That distinction has actual legal implications, with type of agreement you sign determining whether you have a right to stay beyond your agreed term, what notice you must give to leave and whether the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 protects your occupancy. As managed and serviced offices now account for a growing share of every city’s available stock, understanding these differences has never been more commercially relevant for growing businesses.
Key Takeaways
- A licence to occupy is a personal permission to use space; a commercial lease grants a legal estate in land under the Law of Property Act 1925.
- Security of tenure under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 applies only to qualifying leases, not to licences. Flex office occupiers have no automatic right to renew.
- Coworking space is expected to reach 20% of the London office market by 2030, up from 12% today, meaning more businesses than ever are occupying space on licence terms.
- The Law Commission launched a formal review of the 1954 Act in November 2024; its conclusions will shape commercial occupancy rights in the future.
What Is a Licence to Occupy in the UK?
A licence to occupy is a contractual permission granted by a property owner that allows another party to use premises for a specified purpose and period, without transferring any legal interest in the property. Under UK property law, a licence does not create an estate in land. It is a personal right, which means it cannot be transferred to a third party and it expires when the licensor withdraws consent or the agreed period ends.
In the flexible office sector, licences to occupy are the norm. Serviced office operators, managed office providers and coworking centres almost universally offer licence agreements to their occupants rather than leases. The occupier receives access to furnished and staffed space under terms set by the operator, but holds no proprietary interest in the physical premises. If the building is sold or the operator exits, the licensee’s position is significantly weaker than that of a commercial tenant.
Because a licence is personal to the licensee, it typically cannot be assigned to a connected company or sublicensed without the operator’s consent. For businesses undergoing restructuring, group reorganisations or acquisitions, this restriction can create complications that a commercial lease would handle with a standard assignment or subletting clause.
What Is a Commercial Lease?
A commercial lease grants the tenant a proprietary interest in the property for a defined term. Under section 1(1)(b) of the Law of Property Act 1925, a term of years absolute is a recognised legal estate in land, which means the tenant’s interest binds not just the landlord but, in certain circumstances, future owners of the building as well. This is a fundamentally different legal position from that of a licensee.
Traditional commercial office leases in the UK typically run for three to ten years, with break clauses and upward-only rent reviews. Under a full repairing and insuring (FRI) lease the tenant takes on responsibility for the internal and, sometimes, structural maintenance of the premises, as well as dilapidations at the end of the term. The legal process involved, from heads of terms to the final executed lease, typically requires solicitors acting for both sides.
Shorter internal repairing leases, which cap the tenant’s maintenance obligations, are common in multi-tenanted buildings and typically run three to five years. These offer more flexibility than a traditional FRI lease while retaining the legal protections that come with a qualifying tenancy under the 1954 Act.
How Courts Distinguish Between the Two
The legal character of an agreement does not depend on what the document calls itself. The House of Lords established in the Street v Mountford landmark case of 1985 that courts look at the substance of an arrangement rather than its label. The test is straightforward: if an agreement grants exclusive possession of premises, for a term, at a rent, it creates a tenancy in law regardless of whether it is titled “Licence to Occupy.”
This principle has direct relevance in the flexible office market. A workspace operator who grants a business sole use of a defined, lockable office suite at a fixed monthly fee, for a specified period, may have inadvertently created a tenancy rather than a licence, even if the documentation says otherwise. Operators in the flexible sector typically counter this by retaining rights to relocate occupants to different rooms, limiting exclusive access to specific areas or providing bundled services that reinforce the personal nature of the permission granted.
For businesses, the practical implication is this: if your licence agreement genuinely grants you exclusive, uninterrupted possession of a defined locked suite, you may have stronger legal rights than the document acknowledges. Legal advice is worth obtaining before signing any multi-year flexible office commitment, particularly where the space is being fitted out to your specification.
Security of Tenure: The Most Consequential Difference
Sections 24 to 28 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 give business tenants under qualifying commercial leases the automatic right to remain in occupation and renew their tenancy at the end of the contractual term. This is known as security of tenure. The landlord can only oppose renewal on specific statutory grounds, which include an intention to redevelop, persistent breach of the lease, or a desire to occupy the premises themselves. These protections apply only to leases, not to licences to occupy.
For occupiers in flexible office space, this means your operator can decline to renew your licence at the end of its term with no legal obligation to offer replacement accommodation or compensation for disturbance. In practice, most operators do renew occupancies routinely, but the absence of a statutory entitlement changes your negotiating position considerably. According to Savills, London flex occupancy reached 86% in H1 2025, up from 82% in the same period the previous year. In a market operating at near-full occupancy, operators hold most of the leverage at renewal time.
Landlords and tenants can also agree to exclude LTA 1954 protections from a commercial lease through a statutory “contracting out” procedure. This involves the landlord serving a formal notice and the tenant making a declaration, both before the lease is granted. A contracted-out lease removes security of tenure but still creates a legal estate in land, which gives the tenant other property rights that a licensee does not hold. Many shorter commercial leases in multi-tenanted buildings are contracted out as standard.
According to the established principle in Street v Mountford, if a court ever found that your “licence” was in substance a tenancy, you could retrospectively gain the benefit of LTA 1954 protections. However, bringing such a claim carries cost and risk, and operators with experienced legal teams are generally careful to structure their agreements to avoid this outcome.
Which Agreement Does Your Flexible Office Use?
The split between management agreement structures and traditional leases has shifted dramatically at the operator level. Management agreements represented just 9% of flex operator transactions before COVID, rising to 41% by 2024 and to 53% by Q3 2025.
For occupiers, the relevant agreement is the one between you and the operator, not the one between the operator and the landlord. Whether the operator holds the building under a management agreement or a traditional lease, the occupier’s (your) agreement is almost always a licence.
For a team taking managed office space on an 18 to 36 month licence, the practical experience of the agreement, negotiating heads of terms, fit-out responsibilities and break clause notice periods can feel very similar to taking a short lease, but the legal protections are very different. If the operator falls into administration or the landlord reclaims the building, a licensee’s options are limited compared to those of a registered tenant under a qualifying lease. Taking independent advice before committing to a longer managed office arrangement, particularly one involving a bespoke fit-out, is sensible practice.
What the Law Commission Review Means for Businesses
In November 2024, the Law Commission officially launched a formal review of Part II of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, publishing its first consultation paper as part of a two-stage examination. The consultation, which closed in February 2025, explored four possible reform models ranging from abolishing the Act entirely to making security of tenure mandatory with no opt-out for any party.
The Commission’s interim statement confirmed that the existing contracting-out model, under which tenants have security of tenure unless both parties agree to exclude it before the lease is granted, retains broad support and is expected to be preserved. A second consultation paper is expected in the first half of 2026, which will address the technical detail of any amendments, including minimum term requirements, the contracting-out procedure and the forum for lease renewal disputes.
Critically, none of the proposed reforms are aimed at extending LTA 1954 protections to licences to occupy. The boundary between a licence and a qualifying lease, as well as the security of tenure that comes with the latter, are expected to remain in place under any reformed framework. Businesses in flexible offices on licence agreements will not gain statutory renewal rights as a result of this review. What may change is how contracting out works in practice for those who do take commercial leases, particularly around notice requirements and minimum lease lengths.
For businesses currently deciding between a traditional lease and a managed office licence, the reform process provides a useful backdrop but not a reason to delay the decision. CBRE forecasts that flexible space will account for 20% of the London office market by 2030, up from 12% today. Demand for flexibility, speed and convenience that licence-based agreements offer will likely continue its growth, even without statutory renewal rights. Understanding what you are giving up in legal protections when you choose a licence helps you know what that trade-off implies.
How Hubble Can Help
Finding office space that scales with your team doesn’t have to mean starting from scratch every time you grow. Hubble’s advisors help businesses at every stage find the right space, negotiate better terms and avoid the traps that slow most searches down. They’ll share tailored recommendations, organise and attend viewings and help secure discounts of up to 15%, all at no cost to you.
Flexible Workspace Platform: Hubble
- Real Listings: Everything you see on the platform is real. No outdated, unavailable or fake listings.
- Fully Transparent Pricing & Listing Info: Our platform doesn’t hide pricing and details behind contact forms, sales calls or gatekeepers.
- Best Price Guarantee: With Hubble, you get the best deals. Our experts negotiate for you at no extra cost.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does a licence to occupy give me any rights if my operator closes down?
A licensee has no proprietary interest in the premises, so if an operator enters administration, your licence is typically treated as a personal contract rather than a property right. You would not have the standing of a commercial tenant and could be required to vacate quickly. In practice, administrators may continue trading to maximise the value of the business, but there is no statutory protection comparable to what a qualifying tenant holds under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954.
Can a flexible office licence ever become a lease?
Yes, if the substance of the arrangement grants exclusive possession for a term at a rent, a court can find that a “licence” is in law a tenancy, regardless of what it’s called. This is the principle established in Street v Mountford [1985]. Operators structure their agreements carefully to avoid this outcome, typically by retaining rights to relocate occupants and providing bundled services. However, the possibility is still there, particularly for businesses in dedicated, lockable private suites on multi-year agreements.
What is contracting out?
Contracting out is a formal procedure allowing landlords and tenants to opt out of the security of tenure provisions of the LTA 1954, which protects commercial tenants from being forced to vacate the property when their lease expires. It requires the landlord to serve a prescribed warning notice, and the tenant to make a statutory declaration or simple declaration before the lease is granted. A contracted-out lease still creates a legal estate in land, unlike a licence, but removes the tenant’s right to statutory renewal at the end of the term.
What happens to my licence if the building is sold?
Because a licence is a personal right and not a legal interest in land, it does not automatically bind a new owner of the building in the same way a registered lease would. The incoming landlord may choose to honour existing licence agreements, but is not obligated to do so in the same way they would be with a registered tenant. Commercial leases, being legal estates, bind successors in title. This is one of the major differences between the two agreement types.
Conclusion
The choice between a licence to occupy and a commercial lease contains actual legal implications in addition to choices regarding flexibility and term length. A licence gets you into office space in London and across the UK faster, with fewer upfront costs and shorter minimum terms, but it comes without security of tenure, the assignability of a lease and proprietary protections.
For most growing businesses, a licence to occupy within a managed or serviced office is a well-planned trade-off, not an oversight. Understanding what you are exchanging for that flexibility, particularly around renewal rights and what happens if your operator’s circumstances change, puts you in a stronger position to negotiate terms that mitigate the gaps. For a fuller picture of the different contract types available, it is worth reading how serviced, managed and leased offices differ in practice, and reviewing what UK commercial leasing involves if a traditional lease is on the table for your team.
